This commit adds a fix and tests for #1600 and #752.
* https://github.com/pwndbg/pwndbg/issues/1600
* https://github.com/pwndbg/pwndbg/issues/752
Generally, for an example like this:
```cpp
struct A {
void foo(int, int) { };
};
int main() {
A a;
a.foo(1, 1);
}
```
The output for `info symbol <address of A::foo>` returns:
```
'A::foo(int, int) [clone.isra.0] + 3 in section .text of /root/pwndbg/tests/gdb-tests/tests/binaries/a.out\n'
```
We then used this code to parse this:
```py
# Expected format looks like this:
# main in section .text of /bin/bash
# main + 3 in section .text of /bin/bash
# system + 1 in section .text of /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
# No symbol matches system-1.
a, b, c, _ = result.split(maxsplit=3)
if b == "+":
return "%s+%s" % (a, c)
if b == "in":
return a
return ""
```
The `result.split(maxsplit=3)` here splitted the string to:
```py
['A::foo(int,',
'int)',
'[clone.isra.0] + 3 in section .text of /root/pwndbg/tests/gdb-tests/tests/binaries/a.out\n']
```
And since `b` was not `"+"` or `"in"` we eventually returned an empty
string instead of the `A::foo(int, int)` which would be expected here.
Disconnect3d
6d7d06710e